Legal Opinion

Gannon v. Johnston

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 3, 1914No. 4793PublishedCited by 39 opinions

Error from District Court, Jefferson County;. Frank M. Bailey, Judge. Action by D. R. Johnston and Wilburn Wolfe against C. EGannon. Judgment for the plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

ROSSER, Special J.

This was an action by D. R. Johnston against C. E. Gannon, to recover certain lands which constituted the allotment of Agnes Wolfe. By amended petition Wilburn Wolfe, Johnston’s grantor, was joined as plaintiff. Wilburn Wolfe was the sole heir at law of Agnes Wolfe, who selected and • took the land in controversy as her allotment, and while the record is not absolutely clear, it is a fair inference from the whole record, and especially from the stipulation hereinafter set forth, that it was filed during her lifetime. After her death, Wilburn Wolfe sold the land to A. J.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Heckman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Mullen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Steeple v. DowningIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Huston v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  5. Goodrum v. BuffaloCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Tidal Oil Company v. FlanaganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. Chupco v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Patterson v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. McGrath v. RoremSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Miller v. GraysonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API