Legal Opinion
Buell v. U-Par-Har-Ha
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 25, 1916No. 7231PublishedCited by 12 opinions
Error from District Court, Creek County; AVade S. Stanfield, Judge. Action by U-Par-har-ha and others against J. Garfield Buell and others. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
COLLIER, 0.
This is an action instituted by the defendant in error against the plaintiff in error to recover the lands described in the petition. Hereinafter the parties will be designated as they were in the trial court.
Defendant interposed a demurrer to the petition, which said petition, among other averments, averred:
“That the plaintiff, on the 2d day of January, 1913, covenanted and warranted to W. D. Allen, a quiet and peaceful possession of the lands described in the petition; that at the time of the making of said covenant, to wit, on the 2d day of January, 1913, the said…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Huston v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Gannon v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Burckhalter v. VannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
3Cited by12 opinions
- Wilson v. LevySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Culver v. DiamondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Slyman v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Harjo v. OwensbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Brady v. McCrorySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.