Legal Opinion

Bechler v. Kaye

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 21, 1955No. 4857PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RITTER, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Kaye, Administrator of the estate of Morris Schuman, commenced this action in the Western District of Oklahoma against the heirs of Charles E. Wells, deceased, for the purpose of impressing a trust upon certain Oklahoma real property and for an accounting. The trial court determined the issues in favor of the plaintiff and defendants appeal.

Plaintiff claims that in 1939 Charles E. Wells and Morris Schuman entered into an agreement to purchase properties at tax sales and to divide equally all profits derived from their disposition. Parol evidence was…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Ragan v. Merchants Transfer & Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Moss v. MossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Steinberger v. SteinbergerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Biodiversity Conservation Alliance v. JironCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  2. Resolution Trust Corp. v. GreerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  3. Homestake Mining Co. v. Mid-Continent Exploration Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
  4. Armstrong v. Maple Leaf Apartments, Ltd.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1977
  5. Sun Oil Company, as Successor by Merger to Sunray Dx Oil Company v. Vernie FlemingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API