Legal Opinion

City of Fairview Park v. Barefoot Grass Lawn Service, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 21, 1996No. 69947PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant-appellant Barefoot Grass Lawn Service (“Barefoot Grass”) appeals from a no contest plea conviction for violation of an ordinance enacted by plaintiff-appellee city of Fairview Park requiring notice before applying lawn chemicals.

Fairview Park commenced this action by filing a criminal complaint against Barefoot Grass in the Rocky River Municipal Court on July 3, 1995. The complaint alleged that Barefoot Grass applied chemicals/pesticide on a residential property within the municipality without having given prior notice to a specified abutting property owner as required by Codified…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wisconsin Public Intervenor v. MortierSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Ohio Ass'n of Private Detective Agencies, Inc. v. City of North OlmstedOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Fondessy Enterprises, Inc. v. City of OregonOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Clermont Environmental Reclamation Co. v. WiederholdOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State, Ex Rel. Mowrer v. UnderwoodOhio Supreme Court · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. American Financial Services Ass'n v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State ex rel. Board of Commissioners v. TablackOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. City of Dayton v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. State ex rel. Mill Creek Metro. Park Dist. Bd. of Commrs. v. TablackOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Golem v. Village of Put-In-BayDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API