Legal Opinion
Clermont Environmental Reclamation Co. v. Wiederhold
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided December 15, 1982No. 82-280PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.
In response to a rapidly growing public health problem in Ohio,.the General Assembly, in 1980, enacted a comprehensive measure, by way of Am. SH. No. 269, to more effectively control the disposal of hazardous wastes, such wastes generally being the chemical by-products of the industrial and manufacturing process. With the aim and purpose of reasonably assuring that the facilities in the state where hazardous wastes would be disposed of would be designed, sited, and operated in such a manner so as to protect the public interest, the General Assembly amended R.C. Chapter 3734.
*46By virtue of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State ex rel. Evans v. MooreOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- City of Canton v. WhitmanOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- Village of West Jefferson v. RobinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1965
- Garcia v. Siffrin Residential Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. City of PainesvilleOhio Supreme Court · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Canton v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Mendenhall v. City of AkronOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- City of Cincinnati v. Ohio Council 8, American Federation of State, County & Municipal EmployeesOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- Fondessy Enterprises, Inc. v. City of OregonOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Dayton v. State (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.