State, Ex Rel. Mowrer v. Underwood
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.
The contention of the relator is that the department of health of the city of Akron, as it now exists, is a department of the city government, functioning as such under the provisions of the city charter, and is, therefore, required to comply with the charter provisions which place all employees of that department in the classified civil service of the municipality.
The respondents counter with the contention that the department of health is an agency of the state, created by the Hughes Act (108 Ohio Laws, part 1, 236) and the Griswold Act (108 Ohio Laws, part 2, 1085) as amended, and as such…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- City of Wooster v. ArbenzOhio Supreme Court · 1927
- Trustees of the Presbyterian Church v. ChulipIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922
3Cited by23 opinions
- Johnson's Markets, Inc. v. New Carlisle Department of HealthOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- City of Canton v. WhitmanOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- City of Cincinnati v. GambleOhio Supreme Court · 1941
- State ex rel. Gabriel v. City of YoungstownOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- DeMoise v. DowellOhio Supreme Court · 1984
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.