Legal Opinion

Golem v. Village of Put-In-Bay

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided August 30, 2002No. 3:00CV7740PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

CARR, District Judge.

Plaintiff Thomas Golem brings this action against Defendants Village of PuUIn-Bay and Mayor John W. Blatt, claiming breach of contract, defamation, and a violation of plaintiffs civil rights. This court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1367. Pending are defendants’ motion for summary judgment and plaintiffs cross-motion for summary judgment.

For the following reasons, defendants’ motion shall be denied as to the breach of contract claim, the § 1983 claim for deprivation of a property interest under the Fourteenth Amendment, and the defamation claim.…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Abel v. Auglaize County Highway DepartmentDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2003
  2. O'Malley v. NaphCare, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2014
  3. Cook v. Springfield TownshipDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2023
  4. Dalton-Webb v. Village of WakemanDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API