Legal Opinion

Fondessy Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Oregon

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1986No. 85-395PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHoffman, J.

The issues presented in this case are of vital concern and great public interest to every citizen of Ohio, and more particularly, to those citizens who must reside near or otherwise be in close proximity to hazardous waste landfill facilities. We need not dwell at length upon the severity of the problem of hazardous waste in our state. By its very statutory definition, hazardous wastes (generally the chemical by-products of industry and manufacturing) “[p]ose a substantial present or potential hazard to human health or safety or to the environment when improperly stored, treated, transported,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Village of West Jefferson v. RobinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Clermont Environmental Reclamation Co. v. WiederholdOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Weir v. RimmelinOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. City of Akron v. ScaleraOhio Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. American Financial Services Ass'n v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Rispo Realty & Development Co. v. City of ParmaOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. City of Middleburg Heights v. Ohio Board of Building StandardsOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Envirosafe Services of Idaho, Inc. v. County of OwyheeIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
  5. City of Dayton v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2004

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API