Legal Opinion

Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 18, 1950No. 54329; protest 142105-K (New York)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Oliver, Chief Judge:

The merchandise involved in the protest at bar consists of certain carbon cutters made of metal. They were classified as “articles designed *462to be carried on or about or attached to the person” and duty assessed at the combined rate of 65 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1527 (c) (2), Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the trade agreement with France, T. D. 48316. The plaintiff claims the involved articles dutiable as “all smokers’ articles whatsoever, * * * not specially provided for” at the rate of 60 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1552 of the same act.

The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. KressCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  2. Rumpp v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Romicks International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API