Application of Ernie L. Launder and Chester C. Hosmer
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the decision of the Primary Examiner rejecting as unpatentable claims 18, 19, 23, 24, 25, 27 through 33, inclusive, and 35 through 39, inclusive, in appellants’ application for a patent for a “Digger Tooth Mounting.”
The Board of Appeals reversed the Primary Examiner, as to claims 20, 21, 22, 26, and 34 of the application and allowed them. These claims are therefore not before us on appeal, and will not be considered. In re Thompson, 143 F.2d 357, 31 C.C.P.A., Patents, 1121.
Th…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Application of BisleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
- Application of RichardsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
- Application of HallCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
- In re ThompsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
- In re PinkertonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Indiana General Corp. v. Krystinel Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969