Legal Opinion

In re Pinkerton

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 9, 1940No. 4403PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLenkoot, Judge

This appeal brings before us for review a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, affirming a decision of the examiner rejecting, for want of patentability over the cited *804prior art, claims 1, 4, 5, 6, and 8 of appellant’s application for a patent. Claims 2, 3, and T were also rejected, but are not included in this appeal. No claims have been allowed.

Claim 4 is illustrative of the claims before us and reads as follows:

4. In the production of polymerized olefins wherein a heated gaseous mixture containing- a substantial amount of higher olefins and at a temperature…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Application of BisleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
  2. Application of Ernie L. Launder and Chester C. HosmerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
  3. In Re CresswellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
  4. In Re CresswellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
  5. In re LaunderCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API