Legal Opinion
Indiana General Corp. v. Krystinel Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 17, 1969No. 63 Civ. 479PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TENNEY, District Judge.
This is an action arising under the Patent Laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C. §§ 283, 284, for infringement of United States Letters Patent No. 3,036,-009, issued on May 22, 1962, naming Georg Zerbes as inventor and entitled “Ferro-magnetic, Ceramic Body with High Quality at High Frequency”. Plaintiff seeks an injunction and damages.
After hearing the testimony of witnesses, examining the exhibits, the pleadings, the briefs and the proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law submitted by counsel, this Court makes the following findings of fact and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- General Electric Co. v. Wabash Appliance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. United States Plywood CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- Application of Edwin H. Land and Howard G. RogersCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- Formal Fashions, Inc., and Paul Kellner v. Braiman Bows, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Application of Robert J. HarryCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Leonard Kahn v. Dynamics Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Dale Electronics, Inc. v. R. C. L. Electronics, Inc., Dale Electronics, Inc. v. R. C. L. Electronics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1973
- Indiana General Corp. v. Krystinel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Kaehni v. Diffraction CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1972
- Leesona Corporation v. Varta Batteries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.