Pinner v. Pinner
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Judge.
The sole issue presented upon appeal is whether jurisdiction over the person or property of a defendant-obligor is necessary in order to register a foreign support order under G.S. 52A-29.
G.S. Ch. 52A, the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (hereinafter URESA), was first enacted in 1951, and was re-enacted with significant amendments in 1975. S.L. 1951, c. 317, s. 1; S.L. 1975, c. 656, s. 1. As re-enacted, G.S. Ch. 52A very substantially conforms to the 1968 revisions of URESA, which included a new procedure for the registration of foreign support orders. See 9C…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Richards v. Nationwide HomesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Koob v. KoobSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Waters v. McBeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Caudell v. BlairSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
3Cited by17 opinions
- Helmick v. HelmickDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Fleming v. FlemingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Cordie v. TankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- In RE DAVANIS v. DavanisCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986
- Allsup v. AllsupSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.