Legal Opinion

Pinner v. Pinner

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 4, 1977No. 762DC833PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Judge.

The sole issue presented upon appeal is whether jurisdiction over the person or property of a defendant-obligor is necessary in order to register a foreign support order under G.S. 52A-29.

G.S. Ch. 52A, the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (hereinafter URESA), was first enacted in 1951, and was re-enacted with significant amendments in 1975. S.L. 1951, c. 317, s. 1; S.L. 1975, c. 656, s. 1. As re-enacted, G.S. Ch. 52A very substantially conforms to the 1968 revisions of URESA, which included a new procedure for the registration of foreign support orders. See 9C…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Richards v. Nationwide HomesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. Koob v. KoobSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  3. Waters v. McBeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  4. Caudell v. BlairSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Helmick v. HelmickDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  2. Fleming v. FlemingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Cordie v. TankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  4. In RE DAVANIS v. DavanisCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986
  5. Allsup v. AllsupSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API