Fleming v. Fleming

CLARK, Judge.

Defendant bases his appeal on two questions. The first is whether Judge Styles erred in concluding at the confirmation hearing that the Arizona court had personal jurisdiction over the defendant. The second is whether that conclusion foreclosed the defendant from presenting at the enforcement hearing “matters that would be available to him as defenses in an action to enforce a foreign money judgment [i.e., the lack of personal jurisdiction of the court rendering the original judgment]” as provided in G.S. 52A-30(c). We resolve both questions against the defendant.

Judge Styles’…