Caudell v. Blair
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Defendant’s Appeal
WiNBORNE, C.J.
The pivotal question on defendant’s appeal is whether or not the findings of fact and conclusions of law incorporated in the judgment of the court below, and the portions of the referee’s report and supplemental report approved therein, are supported by competent evidence.
This action involves a course of dealing between the parties for a substantial period of time, and necessarily contains a long and complicated account. In such case an order for a compulsory reference will be affirmed. G.S. 1-189. Mfg. Co. v. Horn, 203 N.C. 732, 167 S.E. 42.
*442Furthermore, it is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kenney v. Balsam Hotel Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Dorsey v. North Carolina Talc & Mining Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Gurganus v. . McLawhornSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Ramsey v. . NebelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Threadgill v. . FaustSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Pinner v. PinnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- Keller v. HennesseeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971