Legal Opinion

Koob v. Koob

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 11, 1973No. 7PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOBBITT, Chief Justice.

The summons, and the application and order for extending the time for filing complaint, constitute the only process and pleading served personally on defendant. The only service of the complaint and amendment thereto was made by publication of the notice set forth in our preliminary statement. Assuming this service met all the requirements of G.S. 1A-1, Rule 4 (j) (9) c, the court acquired jurisdiction to award the plaintiff whatever relief she was entitled to obtain in an action for “alimony without divorce” under G.S. 50-16.2.

The order of 4 January 1972 discloses that…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Davis v. . BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  2. Rickert v. RickertSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  4. Rector v. . RectorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  5. Wilson v. . ErvinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hutchison v. Bank of North CarolinaDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1975
  2. Pinner v. PinnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  3. In Re Foreclosure of Deed of Trust From GardnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  4. Cole v. HughesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  5. Crumpton v. CrumptonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API