Legal Opinion
Allsup v. Allsup
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided December 8, 1988No. 102PA88PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Justice.
The sole issue for review in this alimony case is whether the registration and enforcement provisions of the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (URESA) violate the due process rights of support obligors. We hold that they do not and therefore affirm the Court of Appeals.
Summarized as briefly as possible, the record reveals the following pertinent facts:
South Carolina Proceedings
The parties to this suit were divorced in South Carolina on 29 November 1979. At that time the Darlington County Family Court entered an order granting Mr. Allsup custody of the couple’s two…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Martin v. ThornburgSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- Pinner v. PinnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- Monson v. MonsonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1978
- Town of Atlantic Beach v. YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Fleming v. FlemingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Metrocall of Delaware, Inc. v. Continental Cellular Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1993
- Hill v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
- Silvering v. VitoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
- Hill v. HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
- Bear v. ZubatyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.