Thomas v. DeSabato
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
Plaintiffs have appealed from an order of the court below granting a new trial after a verdict in their favor. We will not reverse such an order unless there is a clear error of law or a palpable abuse of discretion. Martin v. Arnold, 366 Pa. 128, 131, 77 A. 2d 99; Frank v. Bayuk, 322 Pa. 282, 185 A. 705; Class & Nachod Brewing Co. v. Giacobello, 277 Pa. 530, 121 A. 333.
The action arose ont of a collision between an automobile, driven by plaintiff Stephen Massaro, and a truck owned by defendant Amedeo De Sabato and driven by his minor son and servant, the other defendant, Sylvio De…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Class & Nachod Brewing Co. v. GiacobelloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- MARTIN v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Bergen v. Lit Bros.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Frank, Admr. v. BayukSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Hamilton v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Board of Trustees Eloy Elemen. Sch. Dist. v. McEwenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
- Cohen AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Litt v. Rolling Hill HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Zitomer v. HoldsworthDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
- Commonwealth v. StradaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.