Commonwealth v. Strada
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Hirt, J.,
This appellant, along with three co-defendants, was charged with burglary, larceny, and with conspiracy to commit the crimes. He was tried separately and was convicted and sentenced. In the light of proofs which unequivocally charge him Avith active participation in the offenses, we decry the circumstances which make it necessary to grant a new trial in the name of due process. Appellant was arrested in Ardmore on September 17, 1951 with three girls, admittedly shoplifters, who subsequently pleaded guilty to the charges. The girls had stolen from the department store of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Commonwealth v. O'KeefeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Commonwealth v. LockardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Commonwealth v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. AckermanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Commonwealth ex rel. Dote v. BurkeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Commonwealth v. SnowSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955