Legal Opinion

MARTIN v. Arnold

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 21, 1950No. Appeals, 4 and 5PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb. Justice Chidsey,

Louis H. Martin, and James Franklin Breese, Jr., instituted these actions in trespass against ' Lloyd E. Arnold, original defendant, to recover for damages sustained when Arnold collided with a school bus operated by Robert Ely and owned- by Russell McKee. Ely and McKee were joined as additional defendants. Arnold appeals from the orders of the court below awarding a new trial to additional defendants, asserting a manifest abuse of discretion.

Lloyd R. Arnold, appellant, between 4:00 and 4:30 p.m., on April 5, 1946, was operating a 1935 Ford V-8 panel truck on…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kline v. Moyer and AlbertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Jones Et Vir v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Frank v. W. S. Losier Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Schofield v. DruschelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  5. Piper v. Adams Express Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Bellettiere v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Carroll v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Decker v. KuleszaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  4. Sherman v. Manufacturers Light & Heat Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  5. Ditz v. MarshallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API