Legal Opinion

Frank, Admr. v. Bayuk

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 28, 1936No. Appeal, 232PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

This is an appeal from an order granting a new trial. An award of a retrial is an inherent power of the court of common pleas and entirely discretionary: Graham v. Graham, 1 S. & R. 330. Such order will not be reversed unless there is clear error of law or palpable abuse of discretion: Duaine v. Gulf Refining Co., 285 Pa. 81; Alianell v. Schreiner, 274 Pa. 152; Hess v. Gusdorff, 274 Pa. 123; Class & Nachod Brewing Co. v. Giacobello, 277 Pa. 530.

The court below assigned several reasons for allowing appellee’s motion. The principal one was improper admission of opinion testimony by a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Class & Nachod Brewing Co. v. GiacobelloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Fornelli v. Penna. R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. McCormick's Contested ElectionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Hess v. GusdorffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  5. Walters v. Federal Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Bellettiere v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Commonwealth v. PowellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Frank v. W. S. Losier Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Cirquitella v. C. C. Callaghan, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union v. AckermanDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1949

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API