Legal Opinion

Hammett v. Vogue, Inc.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 1942PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Justice- Neil

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The plaintiff brought suit in the Circuit Court of Hamilton County to recover damages for personal in juries against the defendant, The Vogue, Inc., and one O. T. Draewell. It appears from the declaration that the suit arose out of an alleged assault and battery committed by Draewell, the manager of the department store. The plaintiff recovered a judgment for $2,000 against both the defendants, which was reduced by the trial court to $500, a remittitur of $1,500 being suggested and accepted by the plaintiff. A motion for a new trial was made…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Solvuca v. Ryan & Reilly Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1917
  2. Kemper v. GluckSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  3. Gorrell v. BattelleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  4. State Ex Rel. Brewen-Clark Syrup Co. v. Missouri Workmen's Compensation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
  5. Bristol Telephone Co. v. WeaverTennessee Supreme Court · 1921

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Webb v. Nashville Area Habitat for Humanity, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Castelli v. LienCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  3. Texas Gulf Sulphur Company v. RoblesWyoming Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Gordon's Transports, Inc. v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1956
  5. Overstreet v. NormanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1957

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API