Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Brewen-Clark Syrup Co. v. Missouri Workmen's Compensation Commission

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided July 30, 1928PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRagland, J.

Original proceeding in prohibition. The facts are not in dispute, and the parties agree as to the questions of law involved. An adequate statement of both 'appears in relator ?s brief as follows:

“Relator filed in this court its petition for writ of prohibition, in which it alleged its corporate existence and the proper legal status of respondents, and that W. M. Amick, a resident of Jackson County; Missouri, entered the employ of relator under contract dated January 1, 1926, as a traveling salesman to travel in the States of Missouri. Kansas and Oklahoma; that at a date after the Compensation…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hunter v. Colfax Consolidated Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  2. Underwood v. McDuffeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Crane v. Leonard, Crossette & RileyMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  4. State ex rel. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. HartySupreme Court of Missouri · 1919

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Davis v. Research Medical CenterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Demay v. Liberty Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  3. Wentz v. Price Candy Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  4. State Ex Rel. May Department Stores Co. v. HaidSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  5. Floyd v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1954

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API