Legal Opinion

Bristol Telephone Co. v. Weaver

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1921PublishedCited by 31 opinions

FROM BRISTOL. Appeal from Circuit Court of Sullivan County to the Court of Civil Appeals, and by certiorari to the Court of Civil Appeals from the Supreme Court. — Hon. D. A. Yines, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hall

An action of damages instituted jointly in the law court at Bristol, by Lula B. Weaver, administratrix of Edward E. Goodwin, deceased, against Bristol Telephone Company and Bristol Gas & Electric Company (both private corporations), to recover for the alleged negligent killing of plaintiffs intestate, Edward E. Goodwin, on February 7, 1920.

Plaintiff’s intestate, at the time lie was killed, was in the employ of the Bristol Telephone Company as one of its linemen, and had been so engaged for some four or five months previous to his death. The accident which caused his death, occurred on Holston…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Peet v. MillsWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Nashville Interurban Ry. v. GregoryTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Swain v. Tennessee Copper Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Breckinridge v. American Central InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1885
  5. Anderson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1902

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. International Harvester Co. v. SartainCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1948
  2. Moeser v. ShunkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  3. Durniak v. August Winter & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  4. Hammett v. Vogue, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Mississippi Power & Light Co. v. WaltersMississippi Supreme Court · 1963

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API