Legal Opinion

Kemper v. Gluck

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 11, 1931PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

— The plaintiff, November 27, 1926, was employed as-a waitress by defendant, who wás engaged'in the' restaurant busi-ness in St. Louis, and while so employed she was injured .by, slipping: and falling upon a wet and slippery floor "which she alleges was negligently permitted to remain in a dangerous condition- while she was obliged to walk upon it in the performance of.her duties. :,On. a trial in the Circuit Court of the City of St. .Louis ■ she: recovered, judgment for $7,200, which was reduced "by remittitur of $1200. From the judgment then entered for $6,000, defendant appealed to the St.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Adams v. Iten Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Ward & Gow v. KrinskySupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Gorrell v. BattelleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  4. Crane v. Leonard, Crossette & RileyMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  5. State ex rel. St. Joseph & Iowa Rail Road v. County CourtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Fulton Insurance Co. v. White Motor Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
  2. McCracken v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LPSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  3. Parmer v. BeanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Walton v. United States Steel CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
  5. Hogue v. WurdackMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API