Legal Opinion

United States v. Massce

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 3, 1915No. 1567PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 37771.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, Presiding Judge

This is. an appeal by the Government from the decision of the Board of General Appraisers sustaining the contention of the importers that certain rope chain was properly classifiable as parts of jewelry under the final provision of paragraph 448 of the act of 1909. The case was submitted to the Board of General Appraisers for decision upon stipulation signed by counsel for both sides, which, so far as material, reads as follows:

It is further stipulated and agreed as to the chains on the various entries in question returned for duty at 85 per cent of valorem, that they are rope chain, composed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rosenberger v. GuthmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  2. Guthman v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  3. United States v. CohnCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  4. Harris v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Hillier's Son Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  2. United States v. SheldonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  3. United States v. ParkCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
  4. United States v. SheldonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API