Legal Opinion

United States v. Sheldon

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 22, 1926No. 2684PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

The merchandise involved in this appeal consists of pistache nuts, salted and roasted. The nuts were assessed for duty by the collector under paragraph 759 of the Tariff Act of 1922, which reads as follows:

Par. 759. Edible nuts, shelled or unshelled, not specially provided for, 1 cent per pound; pickled, or otherwise prepared or preserved, and not specially provided for, 35 per centum ad valorem; nut and kernel paste not specially provided for, 25 per centum ad valorem: Provided, That no allowance shall be made for dirt or other impurities in nuts of any kind, shelled or unshelled.

It was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brown v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  2. Neuman v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  3. Rosenberger v. GuthmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  4. Roger v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  5. United States v. MassceCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Nootka Packing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935
  2. Dutch Cheese Importers Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949
  3. Linhart v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
  4. Conkey v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  5. Linhart v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API