Legal Opinion

United States v. Park

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 22, 1917No. 1731PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 39582.

1Opinion of the CourtDe Vries, Judge

This appeal concerns an importation at the port of New York of certain fancy boxes. Duty was levied under the provisions of paragraph 318 of the tariff act of 1913 as manufactures in chief value of silk. The importers made due protest, alleging, among other claims, that certain of the goods were paper-covered boxes and were more specifically and aptly provided for under paragraph 324 of that act, wherein it is claimed by protestant that the goods should be classified for duty as “all boxes of paper or papier-máché or wood covered with any of the foregoing papers or covered or lined with…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Magone v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. American Bead Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  3. Loewenthal v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  4. Knauth v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  5. Downing & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Keuffel v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
  2. Protest 105766-K of Schiaparelli, Inc.United States Customs Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API