Legal Opinion
Pro-Football, Inc. v. Harjo
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 25, 2008No. Civil Action 99-1385 (CKK)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.
This case began in 1992, when seven Native Americans (“Defendants”) petitioned the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”) to cancel the registrations of six trademarks used by the Washington Redskins, a longtime professional football franchise, and owned by Plaintiff Pro-Football, Inc. (“Pro-Football”). After the TTAB granted Defendants’ petition, Pro-Football brought this action, seeking to reverse the TTAB’s decision. On September 30, 2003, this Court issued a Memorandum Opinion and Order granting summary judgment to Pro-Football…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Ross J. Laningham v. United States NavyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Lashawn A. v. Marion S. Barry, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Pro Football, Inc. v. HarjoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Pro-Football, Inc. v. BlackhorseDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015
- Live365, Inc. v. Copyright Royalty BoardDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Freeman v. Medstar Health Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Larsen v. United States NavyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.