Legal Opinion
Pro-Football, Inc. v. Blackhorse
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided July 8, 2015No. Case No. 1:14-cv-01043-GBL-IDDPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
GERALD BRUCE LEE, District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on two sets of cross-motions for summary judgment. First, Plaintiff Pro-Footbálí, Inc. (“PFI”), Defendants Amanda Black-horse, Marcus Briggs-Cloud, Phillip Gov-er, Jillian Pappan, and Courtney Tsotigh (“Blackhorse Defendants”), and the United States of America, filed cross-motions for summary judgment on PFI’s claims challenging the constitutionality of Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act (Counts III-VI) (Docs, 54,105, and 108). Second, Blackhorse. Der fendants and PFI filed cross-motions for summary…
2Cases cited83 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In RE:TAM en BancCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Daniel J. Quirk, Inc. v. Village Car Company, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board2016
- In RE:TAM en BancCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Ricardo Media Inc. v. Inventive Software, LLC, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board2019
- Spotify AB v. U.S. Software, Inc., Trademark Trial and Appeal Board2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.