Larsen v. United States Navy
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, District Judge.
After remanding this case to the district court with instructions to dismiss the plaintiffs’ claims as moot, the D.C. Circuit recalled its mandate and remanded the record so that this court could indicate whether new evidence made the case newly viable. Having considered the parties’ briefing on the question in light of the Circuit’s decision, the court concludes that the case remains moot.
I. BACKGROUND
The plaintiffs allege that the United States Navy denied them commissions in its Chaplain Corps pursuant to “illegal religious quotas,”…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- County of Los Angeles v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- City of Mesquite v. Aladdin's Castle, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. Concentrated Phosphate Export Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re: Navy ChaplaincyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Chavis v. GarrettDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019