Legal Opinion
Ill v. Manzo-Ill
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 12, 2016No. AC37070PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKeller, J.
*811 The defendant, Ellen Manzo-Ill, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing her postdissolution motion to modify her alimony award. On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court erred in concluding that (1) Practice Book § 25-34(e) 1 authorized it to dismiss her motion for modification, and (2) she failed to show good cause for her failure to reclaim her motion within three months of the date it was filed and failed to prosecute the motion with reasonable diligence. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to this…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Krevis v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- In re Investigation of the Grand Juror into the Bethel Police DepartmentSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- ATC Partnership v. Town of WindhamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Wexler v. DeMaioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- In Re Shanaira C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Disciplinary Counsel v. HickeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- Ill v. Manzo-IIIConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022