Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Hickey

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 1, 2018No. SC 19892PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtD'Auria, J.

**691*1181After the defendant, Thomas J. Hickey, voluntarily resigned from the bar of this state, he filed an application for reinstatement, and the plaintiffs, Disciplinary Counsel, and the Statewide Grievance Committee (committee), filed motions to dismiss the defendant's application for reinstatement.1 The issue that we must resolve in this appeal is whether the trial court properly granted the plaintiffs' motions to dismiss the defendant's application for reinstatement to the bar on the ground that the defendant had resigned from the bar and waived his right to apply for reinstatement.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Conboy v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  2. Massameno v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  3. Burton v. MottoleseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  4. AvalonBay Communities, Inc. v. Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  5. D'ERAMO v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. CannatelliConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
  2. In re CunhaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025
  3. In re CunhaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API