Legal Opinion
State v. Wanner
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided June 30, 2010No. 20090280PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARING, Justice.
[¶ 1] Sonny Wanner appeals from a criminal judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of criminal mischief. On appeal, Wanner argues there was insufficient evidence to sustain his conviction, and that the trial court erred when it failed to exclude the testimony of a State’s witness as violative of a sequestration order. We affirm.
I
[¶ 2] Wanner was charged with criminal mischief, in violation of N.D.C.C. § 12.1-21-05, a class B felony, for willfully damaging property owned by another. On June 10, 2009, a jury trial was held. Numerous witnesses testified. The…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. Carlos Manuel Parodi, United States of America v. Edwin Barton Conway, United States of America v. Robert Lee LawsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Lorenzo Gonzalez, A/K/A "Tito," United States of America v. Modesto Anthony Caba, United States of America v. Raphael VasquezCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Gregory Jacen SykesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- United States v. John Henry Butera, Robert Andrew DenomaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- State v. NakvindaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. CainNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. DollNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. TrueloveNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. KinsellaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.