Legal Opinion

State v. Clark

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 2012No. 20110359PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROTHERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Branden Clark appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of theft of property. Clark argues the district court erred in refusing to give his requested jury instruction, insufficient evidence existed to support his conviction, his sentence is erroneous and excessive, and the court erred in admitting evidence the State failed to disclose before trial. We affirm.

*742I

[¶ 2] On July 10, 2007, Clark purchased various tools from Acme Electric Tool Crib of the North in Grand Forks. When a customer purchases an item from Acme, the sales associate asks…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Alabama v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. State v. BertramNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. BertramNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Branden Clark v. Leann BertschCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
  2. State v. TresenriterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State v. ThomasNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  4. State v. BrossartNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State v. KordonowyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API