Pope v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
HIGGINS, Justice.
The state of Texas and the Railroad Commission brought this suit against the Keystone Refining Company, alleged to be a partnership composed of S. B. Pope and Alonso Nix, to recover statutory penalties for alleged violations of orders of the commission made to prevent “waste” under the oil and gas conservation acts and applying to the East Texas oil field.
The case was tried without a jury and judgment rendered against Pope for penalties in the aggregate sum of $6,500. The court found that plaintiffs had failed to establish a partnership between Pope and Nix and that Nix had…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Frank v. TatumTexas Supreme Court · 1894
- Glasscock v. PriceTexas Supreme Court · 1898
- Culver v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
- Tonn v. Inner Shoe Tire Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Dorrance & Co. v. International & Great Northern RailroadCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Railroad Commission v. Fort Worth & D. C. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1942
- Caliva v. Texas Construction Material Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1964
- Allright Auto Park v. Commercial Standard Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1949