Legal Opinion

Glasscock v. Price

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1898No. 706PublishedCited by 51 opinions

Ebbob to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Third District, in an appeal from Williamson County. Price sued to foreclose a vendor’s lien making Glasscock a defendant as claimant of an adverse judgment lien on the premises and had judgment for foreclosure as against Glasscock, who appealed. The judgment being affirmed, he then obtained writ of error.

1Opinion of the Court

DENMAN, Associate Justice.

Plaintiff in error, G. W. Glasscock, on the 12th day of February, 1896, recovered in the District Court of Williamson County a judgment in the following words:

“FTo. 3210. G. W. Glasscock v. M. P. Kelley & Co. — The above numbered and entitled cause this day coming on to be heard by the court, came the plaintiff in person and by attorney, and the defendants in person and by attorney appeared except the defendant R. Lyles, when the judgment herein rendered was agreed upon, to wit:
“That plaintiff, G. W. Glasscock, on his cause of action as pleaded, was entitled to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Frank v. TatumTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Alexander v. SternTexas Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Burk-Waggoner Oil Assn. v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Jung Fu Chien v. ChenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
  3. Howell v. BowdenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  4. Peveto v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Duncan v. Smith Brothers Grain Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1924

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API