Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Culver v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 21, 1934No. 8142PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLAIR, Justice.

George L. Culver instituted this proceeding seeking to restrain the members of the Railroad Commission, the Attorney General, and certain district and county attorneys from enforcing what is commonly known as House Bill No. 99, enacted' by the Second Called Session of the 43d Legislature (chapter 45 [Vernon’s Ann. Civ. St. art. 6049c, § 5]), because the act was alleged to be in contravention of certain provisions of both the State and Federal Constitutions. Others intervened as plaintiffs, and upon final hearing a general demurrer was sustained to the pleadings of plaintiff and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Flint v. Stone Tracy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Wayman v. SouthardSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
  4. United States v. GrimaudSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. United States v. KatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Harrington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  2. State v. Blue Diamond Oil Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  3. Railroad Commission v. Tyler Texas Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  4. McMurrey Refining Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  5. Fleishman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API