Tonn v. Inner Shoe Tire Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Appeal from Haskell County Court; Jas. P. Kinnard, Judge. Suit by the Inner Shoe Tire Company against A. Tonn and another, in which the Tonn Garage was made a party defendant. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
The Inner Shoe Tire Company, a Michigan corporation, filed suit in the county court of Haskell county, which, under a special statute, has concurrent jurisdiction with the justice court in civil cases, on a verified account for $172.80, with accrued interest from March 1, 1921, against A. and Eugene Tonn. The defendants on December 28, 1921, answered by way of a special exception and a sworn denial that the account was just and true in whole or in part. The plaintiff moved to strike out the exception and answer, because, as alleged, it came too late. It alleged that suit was filed April 25,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Phoenix Lumber Co. v. Houston Water Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1901
- McCamant v. BatsellTexas Supreme Court · 1883
- Glasscock v. PriceTexas Supreme Court · 1898
- Emery v. BarfieldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Phillio v. BlytheTexas Supreme Court · 1854
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Smith v. Hanover Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
- Doe v. ColliganAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
- Beckham v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
- Jeansonne v. WillieLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
- Landry v. Acme Flour Mills Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.