Legal Opinion

Frank v. Tatum

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1894No. 88PublishedCited by 81 opinions

Error to Court of Civil Appeals for Fourth District, in an appeal from Bexar County.

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Associate Justice.

On June 15, 1882, E. C. Tatum filed a petition in the District Court of Bexar County, alleging as follows: ‘ Now comes E. C. Tatum and complains of Goldfrank, Frank & Co., B. Openheimer & Co., Cohen & Koenigheim, Frank H. Coleman, and F. J. Hamer,” etc. The petition further alleged, that defendant “Goldfrank, Frank & Co. is a copartnership composed of Max Goldfrank, Abram B. Frank, Simon Lavenberg and Louis Lavenberg, and that defendant B. Openheimer & Co. is a copartnership composed of Barney Openheimer and Alexander Michael, and defendant Cohen & Koenigheim is a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Harrison v. McCormickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Tunstall v. WormleyTexas Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Fitzgerald v. GrimmellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
  4. James Reid & Co. v. McLeodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1852
  5. Leach v. the Milburn Wagon Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1883

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. Jung Fu Chien v. ChenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
  2. In Re Allcat Claims Service, L.P. and John WeaklyTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Glasscock v. PriceTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Kao Holdings, L.P. v. YoungTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Peveto v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1939

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API