Legal Opinion
In re I.J.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided October 18, 2005No. 03-FS-671PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
RUIZ, Associate Judge:
Appellee was charged as a juvenile with possession of marijuana. Following an ev-identiary hearing, certain statements made by appellee were suppressed after the trial judge found that appellee, who had not been given Miranda warnings,1 was in custody when questioned by the police. The judge dismissed the charge pending against appellee, and the government appealed the judge’s suppression order. We agree that appellee was in custody when *614he was interrogated without benefit of the required Miranda warnings, and affirm the trial judge’s dismissal.
I
Motion to Suppress
On…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re IJDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005