Waters v. Woods
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
WOODWARD, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal by plaintiffs on the judgment roll. The question involved is whether the findings support the judgment, or, to put it another way, whether the trial court, after making findings that plaintiffs had been defrauded in an exchange of real property and had suffered damage thereby, was justified in denying them all relief merely because the action was primarily one for rescission and plaintiffs were unable to place defendants in a statu quo position.
The following findings are relied on by appellants:
“IV.
“That it is true that during the period of the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Zellner v. WassmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Hines v. BrodeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Grain v. AldrichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Bancroft v. WoodwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Agar v. WinslowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Russo v. WilliamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
- Galbiso v. Orosi Public Utility DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Karapetian v. CarolanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Papenfus v. Webb Products Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941