Legal Opinion
Shaw v. Continental Insurance
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided October 29, 1992No. 22832PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
On November 7, 1989, appellants Edward and Leeandra Shaw and their three children were injured in an automobile accident when they were struck from behind by Scott Stafford, an intoxicated driver. All of the Shaws suffered personal injuries as a result of the collision. The vehicle driven by Stafford was insured with a $1,000,000.00 liability limit. The Shaws had $500,000.00 in coverage under an uninsured/underinsured motorist (“UIM”) provision in an automobile insurance policy purchased from respondent Continental Insurance Company (“Continental”). The UIM provision required the Shaws…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- Schmidt v. ClothierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Longworth v. Van HoutenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
- Bogan v. Progressive Casualty InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Mulholland v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Company v. Michael A. Farrell and Jane L. Farrell, Appeal of Jane L. FarrellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by8 opinions
- Boyle v. Erie InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Curran v. Progressive Northwestern Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
- Ploen v. Union InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
- Chambers v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raymond F. OTTO, and Betty J. Otto, Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.