Legal Opinion
State v. Wilson
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided November 21, 2001No. CF02644, CF02643 A104895 (Control), A104939PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLinder, J.
In these consolidated criminal cases, defendants were charged with possession of a controlled substance, ORS 475.992, and felon in possession of a firearm, ORS 166.270. The trial court granted defendants’ motion to suppress, concluding that the warrant authorizing the search of defendants’ residence was not supported by probable cause. The state appeals, and we affirm.
On December 17, 1997, Deputy Sheriff McHaney arranged for a confidential reliable informant (CRI) to make a controlled buy of methamphetamine from defendant Moody. The next day, McHaney prepared an affidavit in support of a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. Carter/GrantOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. GoodmanOregon Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. HarpOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. CharlesworthCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- State v. Pelster/BoyerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- State v. ChaseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- State v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- State v. WebberCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- State v. CHAMU-HERNANDEZCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.