Legal Opinion

State v. Goodman

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1999No. CC 95CR2733FE; CA A91979; SC S45026PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.

Defendant was charged with possession, manufacture, and delivery of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. Police officers searched defendant’s residence pursuant to a search warrant and discovered evidence of his involvement with a marijuana growing operation. Before trial, defendant moved to suppress that evidence, arguing that the affidavit supporting the search warrant did not set forth facts sufficient to establish probable cause for the search. The trial court agreed and suppressed the evidence. The Court of Appeals affirmed in part and reversed in part. State v. Goodman, 152 Or App 83,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. VillagranOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. AnspachOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. HerbertOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. MoylettOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. TackerOregon Supreme Court · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. HoldorfOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. CastillejaOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  4. State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  5. State v. HendersonOregon Supreme Court · 2006

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API