Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Sorensen v. State Bank

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1932No. 28195PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.

This is a controversy over the appointment of a successor to a receiver who had been engaged in liquidating the affairs of the State Bank of Minatare, an insolvent corporation.

*110in a proceeding in the district court for Scotts Bluff county, Clarence G. Bliss, secretary of the department of trade and commerce, the branch of government having supervisory control of state banks, was appointed receiver May 31, 1929, and was directed by judicial order to wind up the affairs of the State Bank of Minatare. He qualified and entered upon the performance of his duties, but, during the course of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Burnham v. BennisonNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
  2. State ex rel. Sorensen v. Farmers State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Matteson v. Creighton UniversityNebraska Supreme Court · 1920
  4. State ex rel. Sorensen v. State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
  5. State ex rel. Barton v. Farmers & Merchants InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State Board of Insurance v. BettsTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  2. State ex rel. Wright v. BarneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  3. State Ex Rel. Grape v. ZachNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State Ex Rel. Shepherd v. Nebraska Equal Opportunity CommissionNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Sedlak Aerial Spray, Ltd. v. MillerNebraska Supreme Court · 1996

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API