Legal Opinion

Sedlak Aerial Spray, Ltd. v. Miller

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1996No. S-94-609PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.

I. STATEMENT OF CASE

The plaintiff-appellant, Sedlak Aerial Spray, Ltd., alleges that the negligence of the defendant-appellee, Kenneth Miller, Jr., proximately caused damage to one of its airplanes. The district court entered judgment for Miller in accordance with the verdict, and Sedlak appealed the dismissal of its action to the Nebraska Court of Appeals, asserting that the district court erred in (1) preliminarily instructing the jury, (2) receiving certain evidence, (3) submitting certain issues to the jury, and (4) responding to a question posed by the jury during its deliberations.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Reavis v. SolminskiNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State Ex Rel. Grape v. ZachNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. McWhirt v. HeaveyNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Jaksha v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. JacobNebraska Supreme Court · 1993

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Sacco v. CarothersNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. RobinsonNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. SchreinerNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Tapp v. Blackmore Ranch, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  5. In re Estate of ClingerNebraska Supreme Court · 2015

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API