Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Sorensen v. State Bank

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1932No. 28179PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.

In a proceeding in the district court for Saunders county to wind up the affairs of the State Bank of Touhy, an insolvent banking corporation, Frank J. Zetocha, intervener and claimant, presented a petition for the allowance of *583$4,305.78 as a preferred claim for a trust fund payable in full out of the general mass of assets in the hands of the receiver. The trial court found that the proceeds of the check were not trust funds but deposits entitling claimant to share bank assets as a depositor. From a judgment based on that finding intervener appealed.

The question presented by the appeal is…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Sorensen v. Farmers State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Sorensen v. State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Luikart v. BuckNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Northern Bank v. Federal Deposit InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Davis v. PolakNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  5. State ex rel. Sorensen v. Bank of OtoeNebraska Supreme Court · 1933

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API