Legal Opinion

Estate of Fleming

California Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1926No. Docket No. L.A. 9209PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

A petition was presented in the court below for the probate of an instrument purporting to be the holographic will of the decedent, Fred Fleming, by the terms of which he bequeathed his entire estate to Ruth Dover. Henrietta Fleming, surviving mother *of the deceased, filed a contest alleging that the decedent was of unsound mind and had not testamentary capacity, and that the will was the result of the undue influence of Ruth Dover, J. C. Duncan, and Kathryn Duncan, who were named as respondents. The matter was heard before a jury, and at the close of the contestant’s opening proof the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Estate of SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Estate of BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Wilson v. McConnachieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. In Re Estate of PurcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  5. In Re Estate of BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Hilliard v. A. H. Robins Co.California Court of Appeal · 1983
  2. Finkler v. PurcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Dixon v. EckenrothCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. Hubbard v. DaBellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Jordan v. GuerraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API