Legal Opinion

Finkler v. Purcell

California Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1935No. S. F. 14681PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

This record presents two main questions for consideration: First, that of the validity of the testamentary attempt of Henry C. Finkler, deceased, involving a claim of insanity and undue influence, and, second, that of proper construction of the instrument in ease its probate is declared valid.

The decedent was for some fifty-two years a loyal attaché of this court, serving it in various capacities and particularly as its senior secretary. This latter work was performed until the day next prior to his tragic death. The record shows that the work' performed by him required care, accuracy,…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. In re Estate of McDevittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Estate of PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Estate of DolbeerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Estate of CasparCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Estate of ChevallierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Estate of LingenfelterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Long Beach City High School District v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Llewellyn v. CheesewrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Nolan v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. Estate of DupontCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API